Glycomics, A world changing impact !
Technology Review
Published by MIT.
February 2003
This is one of the older write ups on Glycomics: However i wanted to revisit it as i feel it is a perfect beginning explanation for the new radio show, and the blog.
http://www.impactofglycomics.com/
The radio show was intended to showcase articles such as this. and the researchers behind them.
You will see in the article that Glycomics was picked as one of the top ten technologies that will change the world/ And it was best summed up by James Pauson a researcher at the Scripps Institute: " If you don't have Glycosylation, you don't have health".
http://www.scripps.edu/
The article goes on to address the importance of this research. That by manipulating glycosylation or sugars themselves , researchers can hope to shut down disease processes, create new drugs, and improve existing ones.
I think MIT hit the nail on the head with this choice. And hope to see a revisitation of the science of Glycomics. If any of you readers have an ear at MIT, ask them for a folow up article on the progression of the research.
Enjoy the artticle at
www.technologyreview.com/printer_friendly_article.aspx?id=13060
Glycomics
James Paulson, a researcher at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, CA, lifts a one-liter, orange-capped bottle from his desk. The bottle is filled with sugar, and Paulson estimates that, had the substance been purchased from a chemical supply house, it would have cost about $15 million. "If I could only sell it," Paulson jokes, admiring what looks like the chunky, raw sugar served at health food restaurants.
In fact, Cytel, a biotech company Paulson once helped run, synthesized the sugar-one of thousands made by the human body-with hopes it could be sold to truly boost health. Cytel's aim was to turn the sugar into a drug that could tame the immune system to minimize damage following heart attacks and surgery. That ambition failed, but the effort to understand and ultimately harness sugars-a field called glycomics-is thriving. And Paulson, who has gone on to cofound Abaron Biosciences in La Jolla, CA, is leading the way, developing new glycomic drugs that could have an impact on health problems ranging from rheumatoid arthritis to the spread of cancer cells.
The reason for the excitement around glycomics is that sugars have a vital, albeit often overlooked, function in the body. In particular, sugars play a critical role in stabilizing and determining the function of proteins through a process called glycosylation, in which sugar units are attached to other molecules including newly made proteins. "If you don't have any glycosylation, you don't have life," says Paulson.
By manipulating glycosylation or sugars themselves, researchers hope to shut down disease processes, create new drugs, and improve existing ones. Biotech giant Amgen, for instance, made a more potent version of its best-selling drug (a protein called erythropoietin, which boosts red-blood-cell production) by attaching two extra sugars to the molecule. Other companies such as GlycoGenesys, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, and Oxford Glycoscience have glycomic drugs in human tests for ailments ranging from Gaucher's disease to colorectal cancer. "The medical potential...is absolutely enormous," says Abaron cofounder Jamey Marth, a geneticist at the University of California, San Diego.
Despite the importance of sugars, efforts to unravel their secrets long remained in the shadows of research into genes and proteins-in part because there is no simple "code" that determines sugars' structures. But over the last few decades, researchers have slowly uncovered clues to sugars' functions. In the late 1980s, Paulson and his team isolated a gene for one of the enzymes responsible for glycosylation. Since that watershed event, scientists have been piecing together an ever more detailed understanding of the ways sugars can in some instances ensure healthy functioning and in others make us susceptible to disease.
It's a gargantuan task. Researchers estimate that as many as 40,000 genes make up each person, and each gene can code for several proteins. Sugars modify many of those proteins, and various cell types attach the same sugars in different ways, forming a variety of branching structures, each with a unique function. "It's a nightmare" to figure all this out, says Paulson. "In order for the field to progress rapidly, we need to bring together the experts in the various subfields to think about the problems of bridging the technologies and beginning to move toward a true glycomics approach." In an attempt do just that, Paulson heads the Consortium for Functional Glycomics. The group, comprising more than 40 academics from a number of disciplines, has a five-year $34 million grant from the National Institutes of Health.
Despite this large-scale effort and healthy dose of federal funding, however, Paulson stresses that the consortium cannot detail every sugar in the body. "We're just taking a bite out of the apple." But what a sweet, large apple it is. - Jon Cohen
Others in GLYCOMICS RESEARCHER PROJECT Carolyn Bertozzi U. California, Berkeley; Thios Pharmaceuticals Glycosylation and receptor binding in disease Richard Cummings U. Oklahoma Sugars in cell adhesion Stuart Kornfeld Washington U. School of Medicine Pathways of glycosylation and genetic disorders John Lowe U. Michigan Sugars in immunity and cancer Jamey Marth U. California, San Diego; Abaron Biosciences Sugars in physiology and disease
Published by MIT.
February 2003
This is one of the older write ups on Glycomics: However i wanted to revisit it as i feel it is a perfect beginning explanation for the new radio show, and the blog.
http://www.impactofglycomics.com/
The radio show was intended to showcase articles such as this. and the researchers behind them.
You will see in the article that Glycomics was picked as one of the top ten technologies that will change the world/ And it was best summed up by James Pauson a researcher at the Scripps Institute: " If you don't have Glycosylation, you don't have health".
http://www.scripps.edu/
The article goes on to address the importance of this research. That by manipulating glycosylation or sugars themselves , researchers can hope to shut down disease processes, create new drugs, and improve existing ones.
I think MIT hit the nail on the head with this choice. And hope to see a revisitation of the science of Glycomics. If any of you readers have an ear at MIT, ask them for a folow up article on the progression of the research.
Enjoy the artticle at
www.technologyreview.com/printer_friendly_article.aspx?id=13060
Glycomics
James Paulson, a researcher at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, CA, lifts a one-liter, orange-capped bottle from his desk. The bottle is filled with sugar, and Paulson estimates that, had the substance been purchased from a chemical supply house, it would have cost about $15 million. "If I could only sell it," Paulson jokes, admiring what looks like the chunky, raw sugar served at health food restaurants.
In fact, Cytel, a biotech company Paulson once helped run, synthesized the sugar-one of thousands made by the human body-with hopes it could be sold to truly boost health. Cytel's aim was to turn the sugar into a drug that could tame the immune system to minimize damage following heart attacks and surgery. That ambition failed, but the effort to understand and ultimately harness sugars-a field called glycomics-is thriving. And Paulson, who has gone on to cofound Abaron Biosciences in La Jolla, CA, is leading the way, developing new glycomic drugs that could have an impact on health problems ranging from rheumatoid arthritis to the spread of cancer cells.
The reason for the excitement around glycomics is that sugars have a vital, albeit often overlooked, function in the body. In particular, sugars play a critical role in stabilizing and determining the function of proteins through a process called glycosylation, in which sugar units are attached to other molecules including newly made proteins. "If you don't have any glycosylation, you don't have life," says Paulson.
By manipulating glycosylation or sugars themselves, researchers hope to shut down disease processes, create new drugs, and improve existing ones. Biotech giant Amgen, for instance, made a more potent version of its best-selling drug (a protein called erythropoietin, which boosts red-blood-cell production) by attaching two extra sugars to the molecule. Other companies such as GlycoGenesys, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, and Oxford Glycoscience have glycomic drugs in human tests for ailments ranging from Gaucher's disease to colorectal cancer. "The medical potential...is absolutely enormous," says Abaron cofounder Jamey Marth, a geneticist at the University of California, San Diego.
Despite the importance of sugars, efforts to unravel their secrets long remained in the shadows of research into genes and proteins-in part because there is no simple "code" that determines sugars' structures. But over the last few decades, researchers have slowly uncovered clues to sugars' functions. In the late 1980s, Paulson and his team isolated a gene for one of the enzymes responsible for glycosylation. Since that watershed event, scientists have been piecing together an ever more detailed understanding of the ways sugars can in some instances ensure healthy functioning and in others make us susceptible to disease.
It's a gargantuan task. Researchers estimate that as many as 40,000 genes make up each person, and each gene can code for several proteins. Sugars modify many of those proteins, and various cell types attach the same sugars in different ways, forming a variety of branching structures, each with a unique function. "It's a nightmare" to figure all this out, says Paulson. "In order for the field to progress rapidly, we need to bring together the experts in the various subfields to think about the problems of bridging the technologies and beginning to move toward a true glycomics approach." In an attempt do just that, Paulson heads the Consortium for Functional Glycomics. The group, comprising more than 40 academics from a number of disciplines, has a five-year $34 million grant from the National Institutes of Health.
Despite this large-scale effort and healthy dose of federal funding, however, Paulson stresses that the consortium cannot detail every sugar in the body. "We're just taking a bite out of the apple." But what a sweet, large apple it is. - Jon Cohen
Others in GLYCOMICS RESEARCHER PROJECT Carolyn Bertozzi U. California, Berkeley; Thios Pharmaceuticals Glycosylation and receptor binding in disease Richard Cummings U. Oklahoma Sugars in cell adhesion Stuart Kornfeld Washington U. School of Medicine Pathways of glycosylation and genetic disorders John Lowe U. Michigan Sugars in immunity and cancer Jamey Marth U. California, San Diego; Abaron Biosciences Sugars in physiology and disease



0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home